NIS 2 Directive Training for the Board
Overview
According to Article 20 of the NIS 2 Directive, "Member States shall ensure that the members of the management bodies of essential and important entities are required to follow training, and shall encourage essential and important entities to offer similar training to their employees on a regular basis, in order that they gain sufficient knowledge and skills to enable them to identify risks and assess cybersecurity risk-management practices and their impact on the services provided by the entity".
According to Article 21 of the NIS 2 Directive:
"1. Member States shall ensure that essential and important entities take appropriate and proportionate technical, operational and organisational measures to manage the risks posed to the security of network and information systems which those entities use for their operations or for the provision of their services, and to prevent or minimise the impact of incidents on recipients of their services and on other services."
"Taking into account the state-of-the-art and, where applicable, relevant European and international standards, as well as the cost of implementation, the measures referred to in the first subparagraph shall ensure a level of security of network and information systems appropriate to the risks posed. When assessing the proportionality of those measures, due account shall be taken of the degree of the entity’s exposure to risks, the entity’s size and the likelihood of occurrence of incidents and their severity, including their societal and economic impact."
"2. The measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall be based on an all-hazards approach that aims to protect network and information systems and the physical environment of those systems from incidents, and shall include at least the following:"
"(a) policies on risk analysis and information system security;
(b) incident handling;
(c) business continuity, such as backup management and disaster recovery, and crisis management;
(d) supply chain security, including security-related aspects concerning the relationships between each entity and its direct
suppliers or service providers;
(e) security in network and information systems acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability
handling and disclosure;
(f) policies and procedures to assess the effectiveness of cybersecurity risk-management measures;
(g) basic cyber hygiene practices and cybersecurity training;
(h) policies and procedures regarding the use of cryptography and, where appropriate, encryption;
(i) human resources security, access control policies and asset management;
(j) the use of multi-factor authentication or continuous authentication solutions, secured voice, video and text
communications and secured emergency communication systems within the entity, where appropriate."
It is a clear requirement from the NIS 2 Directive that the Board of Directors and the CEO must have the knowledge and skills necessary to assess cybersecurity risks, challenge security plans, discuss activities, formulate opinions, and evaluate policies and solutions that protect the assets of their organization. The failure to maintain adequate risk oversight can expose companies, officers, and directors to liability.
Directors owe fiduciary duties to their shareholders and have a significant role in overseeing the risk management of the company. The failure to exercise appropriate oversight in the face of known risks constitutes a breach of the duty of loyalty. A decision about cybersecurity that was “ill-advised or negligent” constitutes a breach of the duty of care.
The Board and the CEO must also assess whether and how to disclose a cyberattack internally and externally to customers and investors. After a successful cyberattack, companies and organizations must provide evidence that they have an adequate and tested cybersecurity program in place that meets international standards, and that they are prepared to respond to a security breach properly and quickly.
Our Briefings for the Board:
We offer custom briefings for the Board of Directors and executive management, tailored to the specific needs of each legal entity. Our briefings can be short and comprehensive (60 minutes), or longer, depending on the needs, the content of the program and the case studies.
Alternatively, you may choose one of our existing briefings:
1. The NIS 2 Directive for the Board of Directors and executive management of EU legal entities.
2. The NIS 2 Directive for the Board of Directors and executive management of non-EU legal entities.
3. Understanding the extraterritorial application of EU law and the equivalence decisions of the European Commission.
You can find all information below.
1. The NIS 2 Directive for the Board of Directors and executive management of EU legal entities.
Course Synopsis
- Are you sure we must comply with the NIS 2 Directive? Where can we find this information?
- Are we an essential or important entity? Why?
- What is this "high common level of cybersecurity across the EU"?
- The new competent authorities - the Cooperation Group, the cyber crisis management authorities, the single points of contact on cybersecurity, and the Computer Security Incident Response Teams (CSIRTs).
- The European cyber crisis liaison organisation network (EU-CyCLONe) for large-scale cybersecurity incidents and crises.
- The new cybersecurity risk management measures and reporting obligations.
- The new cybersecurity information sharing obligations.
- Cybersecurity risk management measures and reporting obligations.
- Governance.
- The management bodies of essential and important entities must approve the cybersecurity risk-management measures.
- The management bodies of essential and important entities are required to follow training, and encourage essential and important entities to offer similar training to their employees.
- Cybersecurity risk-management measures.
- Reporting obligations.
- Jurisdiction and territoriality.
- Entities are considered to fall under the jurisdiction of the Member State in which they are established.
- Entities are considered to have their main establishment in the Union in the Member State where the decisions related to the cybersecurity risk-management measures are predominantly taken.
- Entities not established in the EU, but offer services within the EU, must designate a representative in the EU.
- The role and the tasks of the representative.
- Cybersecurity information-sharing arrangements.
- General aspects concerning supervision and enforcement.
- What is next: Delegated and Implementing Acts.
- Review.
- Transposition.
- Master plan and list of immediate actions, for firms established in the EU.
- Other new EU directives and regulations that introduce compliance challenges to EU firms: The European Cyber Resilience Act, the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), the Critical Entities Resilience Directive (CER) etc.
- Closing remarks.
Instructor.
Our instructors are working professionals that have the necessary knowledge and experience in the fields in which they teach. They can lead full-time, part-time, and short-form programs that are tailored to your needs. You will always know up front who the instructor of the training program will be.
George Lekatis, General Manager of Cyber Risk GmbH, can also lead these training sessions. His background and some testimonials: https://www.cyber-risk-gmbh.com/George_Lekatis_Testimonials.pdf
Terms and conditions.
You may visit: https://www.cyber-risk-gmbh.com/Terms.html
2. The NIS 2 Directive for the Board of Directors and executive management of non-EU legal entities.
Course Synopsis
- What is extraterritoriality?
- Extraterritorial application of EU law.
- Risk and compliance management challenges for firms established in non-EU countries.
- Are you sure we must comply with the NIS 2 Directive? Where can we find this information?
- Are we an essential or important entity in the EU? We are not established in the EU, and we are regulated in our country.
- Jurisdiction and territoriality.
- Entities are considered to fall under the jurisdiction of the Member State in which they are established.
- Entities are considered to have their main establishment in the Union in the Member State where the decisions related to the cybersecurity risk-management measures are predominantly taken.
- Entities not established in the EU, but offer services within the EU, must designate a representative in the EU.
- The tasks of the representative.
- The "high common level of cybersecurity across the Union".
- The new cybersecurity risk-management measures and reporting obligations.
- The new cybersecurity information sharing obligations.
- The new EU competent authorities and single points of contact.
- The new European cyber crisis liaison organisation network (EU-CyCLONe) for large-scale cybersecurity incidents and crises.
- International cooperation.
- Cybersecurity risk management measures and reporting obligations.
- Governance.
- The management bodies of essential and important entities approve the cybersecurity risk-management measures.
- The management bodies of essential and important entities are required to follow training, and encourage essential and important entities to offer similar training to their employees.
- Cybersecurity risk-management measures.
- Reporting obligations.
- General aspects concerning supervision and enforcement.
- Supervisory and enforcement measures in relation to essential entities.
- Supervisory and enforcement measures in relation to important entities.
- General conditions for imposing administrative fines on essential and important entities.
- Infringements entailing a personal data breach.
- Penalties.
- What is next - Delegated and Implementing Acts.
- Review.
- Transposition.
- Master plan and list of immediate actions, for firms established in non-EU countries.
- Other new EU directives and regulations that introduce compliance challenges to EU and non-EU firms: The European Cyber Resilience Act, the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), the Critical Entities Resilience Directive (CER) etc.
- Closing remarks.
Instructor.
Our instructors are working professionals that have the necessary knowledge and experience in the fields in which they teach. They can lead full-time, part-time, and short-form programs that are tailored to your needs. You will always know up front who the instructor of the training program will be.
George Lekatis, General Manager of Cyber Risk GmbH, can also lead these training sessions. His background and some testimonials: https://www.cyber-risk-gmbh.com/George_Lekatis_Testimonials.pdf
Terms and conditions.
You may visit: https://www.cyber-risk-gmbh.com/Terms.html
3. Understanding the extraterritorial application of EU law and the equivalence decisions of the European Commission.
Course Synopsis
The terms ‘extraterritoriality’ and ‘extraterritorial jurisdiction’ refer to the competence of a country to extend its legal powers beyond its territorial boundaries, and to make, apply and enforce rules of conduct in respect of persons, property or events beyond its territory.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, for example, applies to foreign auditors and foreign companies whose securities are listed in a US stock exchange.
Extraterritorial application of EU law is the application of EU provisions outside the territory of the EU, resulting from EU unilateral legislative and regulatory action.
For example, according to EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), non-EU data controllers and processors in any country, must comply with the GDPR obligations, if they offer goods or services to individuals in the EU.
Anu Bradford, Professor of Law in Columbia Law School, is the author of the book “The Brussels Effect: How the European Union Rules the World” (2020), that was named one of the best books of 2020 by Foreign Affairs.
In 2012, she introduced the concept of the ‘Brussels Effect’, that describes Europe’s unilateral power to regulate global markets.
Anu Bradford explains why most global corporations choose to adopt the European laws, regulations and standards in the design and operation of their products and services.
The EU standards are generally stricter, and in most cases, when you comply with EU rules, you comply with laws and regulations around the world.
Even when this approach is more costly, global corporations prefer to have an enterprise-wide, single mode of production and operations, and to market their goods and services globally.
Following the doctrine "you comply with EU rules, you comply around the world", global corporations and service providers need professionals that understand the EU laws, regulations, standards and guidelines.
When the European Commission determines that the regulatory or supervisory regime of a non-EU country is equivalent to the corresponding EU framework:
- allows authorities in the EU to rely on supervised entities' compliance with equivalent rules in a non-EU country,
- reduces or eliminates overlaps in compliance requirements for both EU and non-EU entities,
- makes services and products of non-EU companies accepted in the EU,
- allows third-country firms to provide services without establishment in the EU single-market.
We will discuss what happens when the European Commission determines that the regulatory or supervisory regime of a non-EU country is not equivalent to the corresponding EU framework, or when the European Commission has not yet determined if the regulatory or supervisory regime of a non-EU country is equivalent.
We can understand better equivalence decisions from the experience we have with the Accounting Directive, the Audit Directive, the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), the Credit Rating Agencies Regulation, the European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), the Market Abuse Regulation (MAR), the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II), the Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR), the Prospectus Directive, the Solvency II Directive and the Transparency Directive.
After this presentation, the Board and executive management will have a clear understanding or what is mandatory and what is "nice to have", and the consequences of non-compliance.
Instructor.
Our instructors are working professionals that have the necessary knowledge and experience in the fields in which they teach. They can lead full-time, part-time, and short-form programs that are tailored to your needs. You will always know up front who the instructor of the training program will be.
George Lekatis, General Manager of Cyber Risk GmbH, can also lead these training sessions. His background and some testimonials: https://www.cyber-risk-gmbh.com/George_Lekatis_Testimonials.pdf
Terms and conditions.
You may visit: https://www.cyber-risk-gmbh.com/Terms.html
Contact us
Cyber Risk GmbH
Dammstrasse 16
8810 Horgen
Tel: +41 79 505 89 60
Email: george.lekatis@cyber-risk-gmbh.com
Web: https://www.cyber-risk-gmbh.com
We process and store data in compliance with both, the Swiss Federal Act on Data Protection (FADP) and the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The service provider is Hostpoint. The servers are located in the Interxion data center in Zürich, the data is saved exclusively in Switzerland, and the support, development and administration activities are also based entirely in Switzerland.
Understanding Cybersecurity in the European Union.
2. The European Cyber Resilience Act
3. The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA)
4. The Critical Entities Resilience Directive (CER)
5. The Digital Services Act (DSA)
6. The Digital Markets Act (DMA)
7. The European Health Data Space (EHDS)
10. The European Data Governance Act (DGA)
11. The EU Cyber Solidarity Act
12. The Artificial Intelligence Act
13. The Artificial Intelligence Liability Directive
14. The Framework for Artificial Intelligence Cybersecurity Practices (FAICP)
15. The European ePrivacy Regulation
16. The European Digital Identity Regulation
17. The European Cyber Defence Policy